We can help you access support from the National Research Council Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC IRAP)

The National Research Council’s (NRC) Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) promotes the development, adaption and/or adoption of technology by innovative Canadian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). PAMI has established an agreement with IRAP to help Canadian SMEs access scientific, technical and business advice, and short-term technical services in support of advancing research and development activities.  Under this agreement, SMEs may access up to $7,500 in funding to assist in product and process development activities, and product commercialization efforts.  This will help SMEs streamline product development, expand innovation capacities, and enhance their ability to compete locally, nationally, and globally. SME’s may be eligible for the project if they are incorporated, for profit, have less than 500 employees, and are located in Canada.  Click here to learn more.

Contact us for details!

Visit us at the AMC Convention and Trade Show November 29 to December 1 in Saskatoon, Sk.

Visit us at the AMC Convention and Trade Show November 29 to December 1 in Saskatoon, Sk. PAMI & WESTEST representatives will be on-hand to answer all your machinery-related questions.


Click here for more details.



PAMI is hosting Western Economic Diversification WINN Information Session.

CALLING SMEs! PAMI is hosting Western Economic Diversification WINN Information Session Thursday, November 9 @ 10 a.m. at Humboldt, SK Head Office. Register here:

Combine Seed Loss Guide

Combine Seed Loss Guide

A method for determining seed loss from your combine based on weight, volume, or seed count with choppers and spreaders disengaged.

Developed by PAMI and Canola Council of Canada.

PAMI Advises Managing Grain In The Bin Carefully Even In Warm Harvest Weather

HUMBOLDT—This fall’s warm, dry weather forecast is a boon for producers but a researcher at Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI) cautions that grain has to be managed as intensively when it is stored in the bin as when it is being seeded and harvested.

Dr. Joy Agnew, project manager with PAMI Agricultural Research Services, said to minimize the risk of spoilage, both grain temperature and grain moisture content need to be controlled in the bin. “Even if the moisture content is considered dry, all grain must be cooled to 15°C or lower to maintain good storage conditions.”

Cooling grain is as simple as blowing air through it, said Agnew. Low airflow rates, around 0.1 to 0.2 cubic feet per minute (CFM) per bushel, are sufficient for cooling, provided the ambient air is cooler than the grain. “There may be some benefit to turning off the fan during the heat of the day, but as long as the ambient air temperature is even a few degrees lower than the grain, the fan should be running,” she advised.

It could take weeks before spoilage in hot, dry grain is noticed so Agnew suggests cooling the grain as soon as possible after binning. Although the target temperature is 15°C, Agnew encouraged producers to take advantage of any cool autumn air to reduce the average grain temperature to 5°C or lower.

“Fortunately, most bins are equipped with a fan and ducting systems that are well suited for aeration and temperature control,” she said. “The challenge comes when grain needs to be dried because natural air drying (NAD) requires a higher airflow rate—0.5-1 cfm/bu—and it is difficult to achieve these airflow rates with large grain depths.”

Selecting the right sized fan can be difficult and complicated, she admitted, “but an improperly sized fan could put the entire bin at risk of spoiling.” To help with the process, Agnew has produced a video entitled Selecting Fans for Grain Conditioning and Natural Air Drying that can be found here.

Agnew said it is important to remember airflow can be impeded when layers of grain in the bin are not uniform. With big bins, there is a higher chance it will contain grain from different fields harvested on different days with varying moisture content, different levels of maturity or different amounts of foreign material.

How the bin is filled is also important. “Central versus eccentric filling, loading from multiple ports and using grain spreaders and other devices will affect the uniformity of the grain properties and, just like variations in grain layers, can adversely affect the uniformity of airflow,” she said. “In real life, the grain mass is almost certainly not uniform, so airflow rates and uniformity are not well predicted or understood.”

Agnew said more research is needed into the effectiveness and economics of large bin grain storage to ensure producers are able to manage their crops after harvest with much less risk of loss.


PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE – A recent study by Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI) has shown that two relatively minor changes in soybean harvest—reducing combine speed and investing in an air reel—can bring significant economic benefit to producers.

The study into optimizing combine efficiency when harvesting soybeans was carried out in 2016 near East Selkirk, MB and compared combine ground speeds of two, three, four and five miles per hour (mph). At two, three and four mph, losses were calculated at about 1.36 bushels per acre (bu/ac) but at five mph, the losses nearly doubled, to 2.18 bu/ac. Assuming a soybean price of $10/bushel, that means the difference between harvesting at four mph and five mph is $8.20 per acre.

Avery Simundsson, project leader with PAMI in Portage la Prairie, said that as new varieties make growing soybeans more appealing across the prairies, producers need this kind of information to ensure the highest possible returns.

“We were surprised at how obvious it was that speed could makes such a drastic difference,” she said. “The critical speed will vary slightly from our study but there will always be a point of exponential jump like we saw between four and five mph. Producers need to know where that point it for their particular circumstances.”

The PAMI study, which was funded by the Canada and Manitoba governments through Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative, also evaluated whether auger headers equipped with air reels are more efficient at picking up the crop, and they are. Simundsson said about 80 per cent of losses during harvest occur at the header but adding an air reel reduced losses by more than half when compared to losses recorded using just an auger header. Again assuming a $10/bu price for soybeans, that is a potential saving of about $12.50 per acre.

“It’s these kinds of relatively simple tweaks to harvest operations—slowing down and maybe investing in an air reel—that can help producers increase their returns by reducing the amount of beans, and profit, that’s left behind in the field.”

The complete PAMI Research Report can be downloaded here.


HUMBOLDT, SK—The Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI) is about half way through a three-year research project that will close the knowledge gap around corn forage production in Saskatchewan as an economically viable option for feeding cattle.

Interest in corn production for silage is growing in the province, said Dr. Joy Agnew, project manager with PAMI Agricultural Research Services, but agronomic recommendations are out of step with new hybrids developed for the province’s particular growing conditions. There is also a lack of information about the cost of corn production compared to other, more traditional silage crops like barley.

“Given the high input costs for corn and the slim margins in the beef industry, producers need the most accurate information possible in order to maximize their profitability.”

The research, which began in the spring of 2016 and is funded by the Ministry of Agriculture’s Canada-Saskatchewan Growing Forward 2 agreement, the Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association and PAMI, involves seeding different brands of corn at different rates and with different nitrogen fertilizer rates at each site, Agnew explained.

The work is being done at five Agri-ARM (Applied Research Management) sites across the province and at PAMI’s test site at Lanigan, she said. Monsanto and Pioneer are supporting the research project by providing seed corn, and Vaderstad donated a planter.

After harvest in each of the three years, forage samples are analyzed for total digestible nitrogen and crude protein, key indicators of feed quality. Tons-per-acre yield data for each seed brand and each seeding and nitrogen rate is also being collected.

Although there is still data to come from this year and 2018, Agnew said she is encouraged by what she sees in the results from 2016.

“There appear to be some statistically significant trends developing so we’re anxious to see the results we get over the next two years so we can do a detailed economic analysis of production costs and the feed value of corn. All of the data will enable us to provide growers with really valuable information about cost-effective forage production.”

“The Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association is interested in finding new methods that will help ensure the health and nutrition of our cattle, as well as the economic sustainability of our producers,” said Marianne Possberg, Beef Production Specialist, Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association. “We appreciate the work conducted by PAMI researchers.”


PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE – Canola producers on the prairies now have assurance that straight cutting their crop is a viable option thanks to a detailed study of harvest methods undertaken by Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI).

“Swathing has always been the reliable harvest method for canola in Western Canada,” said Avery Simundsson, project leader with PAMI in Portage la Prairie, “but it’s good to understand what other options are available. The goal of our study was to provide information that will help people make economic decisions about which harvest method may work for them.”

Conducted in Manitoba during the 2016 growing season and funded by the Canada and Manitoba governments through Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative, the study evaluated four treatments: Reglone, Heat and glyphosate, natural ripening and swathing, which was the benchmark. Simundsson said the data collected showed the method of harvest does have a significant effect in some areas—productivity, harvest efficiency, fuel consumption, harvest speed, time to harvest and operator experience—but no significant difference was found in yield, engine speed, dockage, oil content, green seed or seed weight. She added there was an expectation that straight cutting would result in larger seeds and higher oil content but that did not turn out to be the case.

Simundsson stressed that straight cutting is most appropriate for shatter-resistant varieties of canola due to the reduced risk of shatter loss.

The study’s final report makes no recommendation for one harvest method over another “but if you have a critical harvest window due to factors like weather, manpower or acres left to harvest, I can imagine people using a combination of straight cutting and swathing. It’s very dependent on the producer and their particular operation but we want people to consider whatever method helps you get all of your canola off in the best possible condition.”

For the complete PAMI Research Report, click here.

Producers are encouraged to make important calculation to maximize returns

HUMBOLDT – Saskatchewan crop producers are being encouraged to make an important calculation to ensure they are maximizing their returns this harvest season.

Joel McDonald, program manager of Agricultural Development Services at Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI) in Humboldt, said knowing the rate of combine loss—the amount of crop that ends up on the ground after a pass—is key to making well thought out economic decisions about harvest.

“When you ask how much loss is acceptable, how many bushels per acre or what percentage of yield, there is no wrong amount,” said McDonald. “The error comes if you don’t know how much you’re losing or haven’t considered it.”

The problem is that checking for loss takes time and effort. “The best way to check for loss is to disengage the chopper and spreader to drop the residue in a windrow, and then drop or throw a loss pan under the combine while harvesting at a steady rate. Then, the operator or a helper needs to separate the dust, chaff and straw from the grain in the loss pan.”

The final step is to do a calculation to determine the bushels per acre, said McDonald. Multiplying the grain loss rate by total acres and commodity price could result in significant numbers. “It’s possible to lose over five bushels an acre so I recommend that you check for loss as you get into each crop each year. I’ve done these calculations and often the answer is a simple adjustment or slowing down.”

It is well documented that higher speeds result in higher loss, said McDonald, but going faster also means covering more acres per hour and fewer days to completion. Only by knowing the loss rate can a producer calculate, for example, whether it makes financial sense to slow down, recover more crop and invest that saving in an additional combine. “That’s where the economic decision comes in.”

McDonald said critical decisions about fleet operations are sometimes made by feel or tradition and not based on data. “A producer can make $20,000 from a good marketing decision but he could also make $20,000 from a good combining decision.”

Experts Share Practical Advice For Managing Cow-Calf Efficiencies At 19th Annual Field Day

HUMBOLDT, SK – Western Beef Development Centre (WBDC) is hosting Chip Hines, retired rancher, author and public speaker from Colorado at the 19th Annual Summer Field Day June 20 at Termuende Ranch, east of Lanigan, SK.

During Hines’ session, entitled “Managing for Efficiency”, he will share what he has learned during his 50-plus year career about the importance of working with nature when making marketing, genetic and grazing decisions in order to be efficient and profitable as a cow-calf producer.

“At Western Beef, we strive to research practices and technologies that are relevant and adoptable by producers in order for them to be competitive and profitable in the cow-calf sector.  Chip’s views on the importance of managing for efficiency, knowing costs and continuous learning are very much in-line with Western Beef’s, so it a pleasure to have him come to the Field Day and impart his wisdom,” says Kathy Larson, WBDC Economist.

The Field Day will also feature afternoon field tours and presentations from researchers and veterinarians from the University of Saskatchewan, Prairie Agriculture Machinery Institute, Western Beef Development Centre, Merck, Delta Genomics, and Watrous Animal Hospital. The day will conclude with a steak supper ($15 per plate), which is organized by a local Lighthorse 4-H Club. The complete agenda is enclosed.

“Each year we look forward to sharing current research findings and relevant industry information with producers. This year’s field tour will feature 15 minute talks from nine different presenters on topics ranging from parasites to parentage,” says Dr. Bart Lardner, Senior Research Scientist, WDBC.

In the past, WBDC Field Day events have attracted about 150 to 220 producers from across Western Canada who are interested in learning how they can improve their cow-calf management practices.

WBDC is transitioning to the Livestock Forage Centre of Excellence at the University of Saskatchewan, effective March 31, 2018. The WBDC has been operated for the past 12 years by Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute (PAMI).

For more information about the Field Day and directions to the ranch, visit

The Western Beef Development Centre, a division of PAMI, is a leader in collaborative applied research for the beef and forage industries, identifying and communicating opportunities for profitable innovation. Its mission is to collaboratively link lab and land for the competitiveness and sustainability of the cow-calf industry in Saskatchewan.

MEDIA CONTACT: Kathy Larson | Email:  |  Mobile: 306-930-9354